Black Pilled: Why the ruling elite want to replace you [video]

The elite controlled UN promotes mass immigration of muslims and third world people to Europe and the West, and hence the replacement of the white population, through their policies and agreements, such as these:

United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.

Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/ReplMigED/migration.htm

For the first time on 19 September 2016 Heads of State and Government came together to discuss, at the global level within the UN General Assembly, issues related to migration and refugees. This sent an important political message that migration and refugee matters have become major issues in the international agenda. In adopting the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, the 193 UN Member States recognized the need for a comprehensive approach to human mobility and enhanced cooperation at the global level and committed to:

  • protect the safety, dignity and human rights and fundamental freedoms of all migrants, regardless of their migratory status, and at all times;
  • support countries rescuing, receiving and hosting large numbers of refugees and migrants;
  • integrate migrants – addressing their needs and capacities as well as those of receiving communities – in humanitarian and development assistance frameworks and planning;
  • combat xenophobia, racism and discrimination towards all migrants;
  • develop, through a state-led process, non-binding principles and voluntary guidelines on the treatment of migrants in vulnerable situations; and
  • strengthen global governance of migration, including by bringing IOM into the UN family and through the development of a Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

https://www.iom.int/global-compact-migration

Advertisements

Why the idea of freedom of speech for everyone is flawed

This is what pro-white Youtube vlogger Thomas Baden-Riess has to say about it:

My comments:

To me freedom of speech is really about the right of citizens to criticize a tyrannical government, or that’s the essence of it. Just like the right to bear arms is first and foremost about the people being able to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. It’s not about “giving everyone a voice”.

To elaborate I once more go back to that Tommy Robinson’s free speech rally where one of the organizers had wanted to have a radical muslim (known from Youtube and the Speakers Corner) give a speech there. That’s not just stupid, that’s fucking retarded. And these kind of situations reveal how flawed the “freedom of speech for everyone” concept is, or how people misunderstand the essence of freedom of speech. I’m not saying they’re the only subversive group, but radical muslims are hostile invaders who are working to establish a tyrannical political system in Europe, not people who oppose a tyrannical government, whereas European nationalists are dissidents opposing a tyrannical supernational government (the EU). The concept of freedom of speech wasn’t created for people like these radical muslims, it was created for people like the nationalists of this day and age.

Yes, freedom of speech sounds nice on paper, but when you really think it through you notice it doesn’t work.

Lately a lot of Finnish nationalists and anti-immigration activists have been prosecuted for “hate speech” so there’s a lot of talk about “freedom of speech”, and these nationalists themselves are emphasizing the right for EVERYONE to express their opinions. That would then include muslims, too. So when I pondered whether muslims should be allowed to freely spread their propaganda in Finland, and the answer was obviously no, I realized how ridiculous the concept of all-inclusive freedom of speech is.

The situation we now have in Finland is a perfect example of what the idea of freedom of speech is really about – the right of the people to criticize their rulers. And only when there already is a tyrannical government that’s trying to silence dissenting voices, i.e., suppressing the “freedom of speech”, does the discussion about “freedom of speech” become relevant. Because that’s what it’s indeed all about.

Two out of three European muslims are in favor of implementing Sharia

A majority of the Muslims in Europe want sharia should have precedence over the secular laws of their European host countries. This according to a new study by WZB Berlin Social Science Center where Muslims in six countries interviewed, including Sweden. A study that should concern Western politicians, according to the researchers.

The study posed three questions to the immigrant Turks and Moroccans in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Holland and Sweden:

  • Do you think sharia is more important to you than the laws of the country you live? (66%)
  • Do you mean that there is only one legitimate interpretation of the Koran that should apply to all Muslims? (75%)
  • Are you saying that Muslims should return to their “Islamic roots”? (60%)

Those who answered Yes to all questions be referred to as “consistent fundamentalists” – and these represent 44 per cent of those questioned Muslims in Europe. The fundamentalist attitudes are as common among younger Muslims among the elderly.

https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2015/11/28/most-european-muslims-want-sharia-not-european-laws/

This alone should tell anyone that Islam has no place in Europe. But what is Sharia:

Sharia is Islamic Law.  It is the religious legal system that governs the political, social and moral duties of faithful Muslims.  It is what is meant by “God’s Law.”

The Sharia was derived from the Sunnah – the way of life of Muhammad as recorded in the Hadith (traditions).  It pulls various Quran verses and historical narrations into an organized body of rules.

Although Muslims as individuals often decide which parts of Sharia to follow or ignore, the Quran (33:21) says that it is not fitting for a believer to choose for themselves (i.e., disregard) any matter already decided by Allah.

Likewise, a government that limits God’s Law in any way is an enemy of Allah and must be fought.  The establishment of Sharia is the fundamental objective of every Islamic terror group.  Once an Islamic state is in place, the Quran (9:29) and Sharia (o9.8) make it mandatory for Muslims to fight those Jews and Christians who will not convert or accept inferior status.

This reality is left out by proponents of Sharia in the West, who hide behind the cloak of religion and expose only the more benign personal rules (such as those dealing with prayer and hygiene).  This is to make it appear as if detractors are religious bigots whose real problem is intolerance for a different set of beliefs about God and worship.

In fact, Sharia is explicitly opposed to religious freedom, freedom of conscience and the free exchange of ideas.  It is violent, openly bigoted toward non-Muslims, discriminatory, and unflinchingly sexist.  Large sections deal with the practice of slavery.  None of this changes by affixing a “phobia” label or otherwise insulting detractors.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/sharia.aspx

The classic manual of Islamic law is Reliance of the Traveller, which can be read in its entirety here.

We need to realize and emphasize the fact there is no such thing as “moderate Islam”. Even muslims who see themselves as moderate, and not en extremist, are in fact usually not moderate at all as you can see on the following video, for example:

Islam doesn’t belong in Europe, period.

The Jesuit engineered migrant crisis is for creating a war between islam and Europe [video]

The so called “refugee crisis” has been engineered by the Jesuits, the rulers of the EU through their disciples, like Herman van Rompuy, Jose Manuel Barroso, Mario Draghi, and many others, to create a war between islam and Europeans; classic divide and rule tactics. They’re pushing for open borders through their frontman Pope Francis, who for that was awarded the Charlemagne Prize of 2016 for his contributions to “European unity”, i.e., to the advancement of the federalization of the EU superstate.

The Jesuits also have an organization called the “Jesuit Refugee Service”, which has also on its part promoted the mass immigration of muslims and third worlders to Europe under the pretext of “helping”.

Europe has the power to save and protect people. It’s a just question of political will to provide safe ways for people to enter Europe without risking their lives. It’s time to defend and apply the very Refugee Convention that Europeans set up after World War II and to act upon our founding values.

  • Jean-Marie Carrière, Regional Director of JRS Europe

http://jrseurope.org/news_detail?TN=NEWS-20160608032100