Violent attacks and a death threat against Tommy Robinson on his MEP campaign

England’s most famous anti-islamization activist, citizen journalist, and MEP candidate Tommy Robinson has been assaulted multiple times while being on a roadtrip to campaign for a seat in the European Parlament. One of the assaults was made by a young  muslim man who had approached Robinson aggressively, and when he got have a conversation with him he suddenly threw a milkshake straight into Robinson’s face. Afterwards the muslim man bragged about the incident, but later the globalist islam apologist mainstream media portrayed him as a victim.

Now Robinson has also received a serious death threat, but the politicized British police seems to be unwilling to protect him.

Jesuit Vatican control over refugee resettlement and mass immigration [video]

Scott Lloyd, the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) – Knight of Columbus, J.D. from the Catholic University of America.

Lee Cissna, the Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) – J.D. from Georgetown University, the Jesuit power base in the USA.

Filippo Grandi, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – a graduate from the Pontifical Gregorian University, in Rome, the first university founded by the Jesuits.

The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) is an international Catholic organization that aids refugees, forcibly displaced peoples, and asylum seekers. JRS operates at national and regional levels. Founded in November 1980 as a work of the Society of Jesus, JRS was officially registered on 19 March 2000 in Vatican City as a foundation. The impetus to found JRS came from the then father general of the Jesuits, Pedro Arrupe, who was inspired to action by the plight of Vietnamese boat people.[2] JRS’s international headquarters are located in Rome.

JRS has programs in 51 countries. The areas of work are in the field of Education, Emergency Assistance, Health and Nutrition, Income-Generating Activities, and Social Services. In total, more than 700,000 individuals have been beneficiaries of JRS projects.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_Refugee_Service

A meeting of 80 Mayors of European cities in the Vatican, calling for creating a network of Mayors to deal with the refugee crisis (read: migrant invasion of Europe):

http://www.archivioradiovaticana.va/storico/2016/12/11/european_mayors_meeting_at_vatican_issue_statement/en-1278291

The Catholic Church promoting mass immigration of Mexicans to Catholicize America and build the Vatican’s power base in the USA:

https://farnesius.wordpress.com/2018/11/09/the-vatican-promoting-mass-immigration-of-mexicans-to-catholicize-america/

Why the idea of freedom of speech for everyone is flawed

This is what pro-white Youtube vlogger Thomas Baden-Riess has to say about it:

My comments:

To me freedom of speech is really about the right of citizens to criticize a tyrannical government, or that’s the essence of it. Just like the right to bear arms is first and foremost about the people being able to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. It’s not about “giving everyone a voice”.

To elaborate I once more go back to that Tommy Robinson’s free speech rally where one of the organizers had wanted to have a radical muslim (known from Youtube and the Speakers Corner) give a speech there. That’s not just stupid, that’s fucking retarded. And these kind of situations reveal how flawed the “freedom of speech for everyone” concept is, or how people misunderstand the essence of freedom of speech. I’m not saying they’re the only subversive group, but radical muslims are hostile invaders who are working to establish a tyrannical political system in Europe, not people who oppose a tyrannical government, whereas European nationalists are dissidents opposing a tyrannical supernational government (the EU). The concept of freedom of speech wasn’t created for people like these radical muslims, it was created for people like the nationalists of this day and age.

Yes, freedom of speech sounds nice on paper, but when you really think it through you notice it doesn’t work.

Lately a lot of Finnish nationalists and anti-immigration activists have been prosecuted for “hate speech” so there’s a lot of talk about “freedom of speech”, and these nationalists themselves are emphasizing the right for EVERYONE to express their opinions. That would then include muslims, too. So when I pondered whether muslims should be allowed to freely spread their propaganda in Finland, and the answer was obviously no, I realized how ridiculous the concept of all-inclusive freedom of speech is.

The situation we now have in Finland is a perfect example of what the idea of freedom of speech is really about – the right of the people to criticize their rulers. And only when there already is a tyrannical government that’s trying to silence dissenting voices, i.e., suppressing the “freedom of speech”, does the discussion about “freedom of speech” become relevant. Because that’s what it’s indeed all about.

Two out of three European muslims are in favor of implementing Sharia

A majority of the Muslims in Europe want sharia should have precedence over the secular laws of their European host countries. This according to a new study by WZB Berlin Social Science Center where Muslims in six countries interviewed, including Sweden. A study that should concern Western politicians, according to the researchers.

The study posed three questions to the immigrant Turks and Moroccans in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Holland and Sweden:

  • Do you think sharia is more important to you than the laws of the country you live? (66%)
  • Do you mean that there is only one legitimate interpretation of the Koran that should apply to all Muslims? (75%)
  • Are you saying that Muslims should return to their “Islamic roots”? (60%)

Those who answered Yes to all questions be referred to as “consistent fundamentalists” – and these represent 44 per cent of those questioned Muslims in Europe. The fundamentalist attitudes are as common among younger Muslims among the elderly.

https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2015/11/28/most-european-muslims-want-sharia-not-european-laws/

This alone should tell anyone that Islam has no place in Europe. But what is Sharia:

Sharia is Islamic Law.  It is the religious legal system that governs the political, social and moral duties of faithful Muslims.  It is what is meant by “God’s Law.”

The Sharia was derived from the Sunnah – the way of life of Muhammad as recorded in the Hadith (traditions).  It pulls various Quran verses and historical narrations into an organized body of rules.

Although Muslims as individuals often decide which parts of Sharia to follow or ignore, the Quran (33:21) says that it is not fitting for a believer to choose for themselves (i.e., disregard) any matter already decided by Allah.

Likewise, a government that limits God’s Law in any way is an enemy of Allah and must be fought.  The establishment of Sharia is the fundamental objective of every Islamic terror group.  Once an Islamic state is in place, the Quran (9:29) and Sharia (o9.8) make it mandatory for Muslims to fight those Jews and Christians who will not convert or accept inferior status.

This reality is left out by proponents of Sharia in the West, who hide behind the cloak of religion and expose only the more benign personal rules (such as those dealing with prayer and hygiene).  This is to make it appear as if detractors are religious bigots whose real problem is intolerance for a different set of beliefs about God and worship.

In fact, Sharia is explicitly opposed to religious freedom, freedom of conscience and the free exchange of ideas.  It is violent, openly bigoted toward non-Muslims, discriminatory, and unflinchingly sexist.  Large sections deal with the practice of slavery.  None of this changes by affixing a “phobia” label or otherwise insulting detractors.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/sharia.aspx

The classic manual of Islamic law is Reliance of the Traveller, which can be read in its entirety here.

We need to realize and emphasize the fact there is no such thing as “moderate Islam”. Even muslims who see themselves as moderate, and not en extremist, are in fact usually not moderate at all as you can see on the following video, for example:

Islam doesn’t belong in Europe, period.