Ted Kennedy in 1965: the ethnic mix of America will not be upset

Senator Ted Kennedy famously asserted during the debates over the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, or the Hart–Celler Act, that “our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.”

However, back then non-Hispanic white people were still 85% of the US population… but now only 60%. So abolishing all national quota based restrictions on immigration has indeed “upset the ethnic mix” of America, the racial makeup of the country has changed dramatically. Yet leftists are still trying to deny the reality of the Great Replacement, as I reported recently.

Here’s a tweet from a Polish nationalist which includes a video illustration of the demographic shift of America:

Incidentally, Ted Kennedy was a Roman Catholic, which is noteworthy and relevant because the Vatican and the American Catholic establishment have been one of the main forces, if not THE main force, behind the “browning of America”, as I’ve extensively documented before.

Jared Taylor on the left contradicting itself regarding the Great Replacement

As we have come to know, New York Times is one of the most prominent and foremost outlets of anti-white propaganda. One of their leftist columnists, Jewish Michelle Goldberg, declares, “we can replace them”, and celebrates the demographic changes and that white conservatives are consequently losing their influence;

Right now America is tearing itself apart as an embittered white conservative minority clings to power, terrified at being swamped by a new multiracial polyglot majority. The divide feels especially stark in Georgia, where the midterm election is a battle between Trumpist reaction and the multicultural America whose emergence the right is trying, at all costs, to forestall.

But on the other hand, another one of their leftist columnists, Farhad Manjoo, proclaims that the Great Replacement, i.e., the replacement of white people in their own countries through mass immigration of non-white people, with the white population being in decline due the birthrates way below the 2.1 which is needed to maintain the population, is a “racist and misogynistic conspiracy theory”. He goes on to say that “nobody really knows if whites will become a minority in the United States” because “racial categories are blurry”.

Yes, they know. According to latest census projections, non-Hispanic whites will become a minority in America in 2045, which New York Times also acknowledged in their November 2018 article “Why the Announcement of a Looming White Minority Makes Demographers Nervous”. And the anti-white leftists have no problem with defining who is white when they associate white people with something perceived as negative, like “white privilege”, or try to invoke “white guilt” when they want to get something from white people. Manjoo also tries to play down the fact that white people are losing sociopolitical influence in America as a consequence of the demographic changes, saying “white Americans are not facing a social and economic dead end”.

Yet at the same time, leftist journalists are celebrating the demographic shift, or the “browning of America”, and gloating over the fact that it’s swinging electoral votes in favor of the democrats because the Hispanics (as well as other non-whites), as a group, overwhelmingly vote for them.

The US president’s hard line on deportation and immigration is too late to prevent a major demographic shift to non-whites, who tend to vote for the Democrats, says Bette Browne.

There is a demographic revolution in America and the president, Donald Trump, seems determined to impede it. Yet all the signs are that he has already lost the battle.

The power of this new demographic first became obvious when 70% of Hispanic voters helped to make Barack Obama the country’s first black president in 2008.


In my opinion, this blue wave clearly indicates the new demographic politics in the country. That is, the so-called “browning of America” manifested itself in this election. It had manifested itself in Barack Obama’s two electoral victories in his presidential races, but not in the midterm elections. This time it did. More Latinos and other minority groups voted in this election than ever before.


So leftists say; “America is becoming less white, and it’s great that white conservatives are losing power”, and leftists also say; “The population replacement is a far-right white supremacist conspiracy theory, and white people don’t need to worry about losing power”. I.e., what anti-white leftists like Farhad Manjoo are doing, is deceitful and outright gaslighting.

“Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white

The mantra coined by the late great Bob Whitaker:


Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


Jesuit trained John F. Kelly succeeded by yet another Jesuit as the White House Chief of Staff

When Jesuit trained John F. Kelly (MA from Georgetown University, the Washington, D.C. based Jesuit power base in America) replaced Greek American Reince Priebus as the White House Chief of Staff in July 2017, he put Ivanka Trump’s Jewish husband Jared Kushner in his place.

Not long after he became a senior presidential adviser to Donald Trump,Jared Kushner, then 36, described himself to a prominent Republican as “primus inter pares”—the first among equals. Kushner’s vast policy portfolio—so broad it became a punch line—reflected his view that, as family, he and his wife, Ivanka Trump, would not be constrained by traditional lines of authority. Kushner’s vision of his role was largely true during the chaotic tenure of Chief of Staff Reince Priebus. But in the John Kelly era, Jared and Ivanka have both seen their bailiwicks dramatically shrink—and they have not been happy about it.


John F. Kelly previously served as the Secretary of Homeland Security, the infamous agency which was created by the Jesuits as I’ve shown. Also take note that the Patriot Act, which the DHS has utilized, was authored by a Georgetown University professor of law, Viet D. Dinh. Jesuit fingerprints are all over the post-9/11 surveillance state.

Kelly left the White House in January 2019 and was succeeded by Mick Mulvaney. Mulvaney is also… you guessed it, Jesuit trained (BS from Georgetown University). By the way, Mulvaney had called Donald Trump a “horrible human being” in 2016, and now he’s serving as an advisor to Trump. To me, this kind of exemplifies how much politics is just theater, or should I say “Jesuit theater”; a lot of buzz and “scandals” around Trump, the figurehead, and meanwhile behind the scenes the Jesuits install their own men on key positions to quietly further their agenda.

So, Kelly and Mulvaney are both Jesuit trained, and so were these White House Chiefs of Staff under Barack Obama: William M. Daley (2011-2012), Jack Lew (2012-2013), and Denis McDonough (2013-2017). Just a coincidence, right?

Remember Donald Trump is himself Jesuit trained, he attended Fordham University in New York, and he’s sent his children Ivanka, Eric and Tiffany to study at Georgetown University. Eric Trump graduated from Georgetown University and he’s been a member of the Georgetown business school advisory board.

Violent attacks and a death threat against Tommy Robinson on his MEP campaign

England’s most famous anti-islamization activist, citizen journalist, and MEP candidate Tommy Robinson has been assaulted multiple times while being on a roadtrip to campaign for a seat in the European Parlament. One of the assaults was made by a young  muslim man who had approached Robinson aggressively, and when he got have a conversation with him he suddenly threw a milkshake straight into Robinson’s face. Afterwards the muslim man bragged about the incident, but later the globalist islam apologist mainstream media portrayed him as a victim.

Now Robinson has also received a serious death threat, but the politicized British police seems to be unwilling to protect him.

Jesuit agent provocateurs on the congressional hearing on White nationalism [video]

The House Judiciary Committee hearing on “hate crimes” and the “rise of White nationalism was an absolute clown show, that goes without saying. But also take note that the committee chairman Jerry Nadler, while ethnically Jewish, is Jesuit trained (JD from Fordham University), and that the most eager anti-White and anti-American agitator on the hearing was David Cicilline, a Roman Catholic Jesuit trained at Georgetown University, the Jesuit headquarters in America.

Let’s also remind ourselves that the US Supreme Court is under heavy Jesuit Vatican influence like the House Judiciary Committee; the Jesuits have effectively seized control of the US judicial system.