In a nutshell, the endgame of the new world order agenda is a technocratic, transhumanist, totalitarian surveillance society, and the preplanned coronavirus pandemic psyop is being used to usher that in and brainwash people to accept it.
Jared Taylor on the left contradicting itself regarding the Great Replacement:
President George W. Bush refers to the “war on terror” as a “crusade” a few days after the staged false flag 9/11 terrorists attacks:
Many might think that was a slip or mistake, but I don’t think so. I believe he meant what he said, and that he had most likely been told by his Catholic advisors to use that word.
George W. Bush the “nation’s first Catholic president”
In 2008, during George W. Bush’s presidency, The Washington Post published the op-ed “A Catholic Wind in the White House”, where he was referred to as the “nation’s first Catholic president”;
Shortly after Pope Benedict XVI’s election in 2005, President Bush met with a small circle of advisers in the Oval Office. As some mentioned their own religious backgrounds, the president remarked that he had read one of the new pontiff’s books about faith and culture in Western Europe.
Save for one other soul, Bush was the only non-Catholic in the room. But his interest in the pope’s writings was no surprise to those around him. As the White House prepares to welcome Benedict on Tuesday, many in Bush’s inner circle expect the pontiff to find a kindred spirit in the president. Because if Bill Clinton can be called America’s first black president, some say, then George W. Bush could well be the nation’s first Catholic president.
This isn’t as strange a notion as it sounds. Yes, there was John F. Kennedy. But where Kennedy sought to divorce his religion from his office, Bush has welcomed Roman Catholic doctrine and teachings into the White House and based many important domestic policy decisions on them.
“I don’t think there’s any question about it,” says Rick Santorum, former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania and a devout Catholic, who was the first to give Bush the “Catholic president” label. “He’s certainly much more Catholic than Kennedy.”
Bush attends an Episcopal church in Washington and belongs to a Methodist church in Texas, and his political base is solidly evangelical. Yet this Protestant president has surrounded himself with Roman Catholic intellectuals, speechwriters, professors, priests, bishops and politicians. These Catholics — and thus Catholic social teaching — have for the past eight years been shaping Bush’s speeches, policies and legacy to a degree perhaps unprecedented in U.S. history.
“I used to say that there are more Catholics on President Bush’s speechwriting team than on any Notre Dame starting lineup in the past half-century,” said former Bush scribe — and Catholic — William McGurn.
In April 2008, Bush said he sees God in Pope Benedict‘s eyes:
Finally, Arroyo asked him, “You said, famously, when you looked into Vladimir Putin’s eyes you saw his soul. […] When you look into Benedict XVI’s eyes what do you see?”
And Bush answered immediately, “God.”
Now the crusade reference is starting to make more sense, isn’t it?
In 2004 Bush spoke at the Knights of Columbus (K of C ) convention. The Knights of Columbus is a Catholic fraternal order, founded by Michael J. McGivney, a Catholic priest, who had originally wanted to become a Jesuit. Today the order has almost 2 million members around the world. Bush’s brother Jeb, a devout Roman Catholic, is a 4th degree Knight of Columbus.
George W. Bush at the K of C convention
Notice the Roman fasces in the K of C logo. There’s a fasces also on both sides behind the Speaker’s podium in the United States House of Representatives, which is inside the United States Capitol.
(On the outside, the United States Capitol looks a lot like the St. Peter’s Basilica, is located on Capitol Hill, as in the Capitoline Hill in Rome, and what’s more, both these buildings face an obelisk. Do you think they might be trying to tell us something…)
George Bush Sr. spoke at the Knight of Columbus convention in 1984, 1988 and 1992, and he was an honorary Knight of Malta, like Ronald Reagan, who historically established diplomatic relations with the Vatican in 1984. In 1991, George Bush hosted the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, Andrew Bertie, at the White House.
Andrew Bertie and George Bush at the White House, 1991
George W. Bush has also spoken many times at the Legatus summit. Legatus is a global network of Catholic business leaders, founded by Tom Monaghan, the founder of Domino’s Pizza. Monaghan is a Knight of Malta.
But weren’t the “Jewish” Neocons behind the Iraq War?
It’s true that leading neoconservatives played a major part in the buildup to the Iraq War, and that many of them were Jewish, such as these men who served in key positions in the Bush administration: Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense (2001-2005); Douglas J. Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (2001-2005), Elliot Abrams; Richard Perle; and Bill Kristol, the founder of the neoconservative think tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which initiated an open letter to Jesuit trained President Bill Clinton calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein already in 1998.
Neocons weren’t all Jewish, though, and among the 25 signatories to the PNAC’s Statement of Principles were these non-Jewish men, for example:
– Dick Cheney, Vice President of the United States (2001-2009). Cheney was probably the most powerful government official in the Bush admistration, or the de facto president. In the 1980s and 1990s he was a director of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the New York City based globalist think tank that has enormous influence on the US government.
— Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense (2001-2006). Rumsfeld attended Georgetown University, the formidable Jesuit university in Washington D.C., which is also the Jesuit headquarters in America. While attending Princeton, he was a friend of future Secretary of Defense under Reagan and Knight of Malta, Frank Carlucci. Carlucci and Rumsfeld were also associates during their political careers, and Carlucci, too, was affiliated with the PNAC.
– Frank Gaffney, a national security advisor in the Reagan administration. Gaffney was Jesuit trained at Georgetown University and is a member of the conservative counterpart of the CFR, the Council for National Policy (CNP). (Among CNP members are also Trump’s key advisors Kellyanne Conway and Jesuit trained Steve Bannon.)
– William J. Bennett, a conservative pundit. Bennett graduated form a Jesuit high school and served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.
– Zalmay Khalilzad, United States Ambassador to Afghanistan (2003-2004), United States Ambassador to Iraq (2005-2007), U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation. Khalilzad has been a CFR member and served as a counselor to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the think tank founded at Georgetown University in 1962. (The formal affiliation between CSIS and Georgetown ended in 1987.)
It’s also worth noting that Elliot Abrams has been affiliated with the Georgetown University and taught foreign policy at its Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, and that Douglas J. Feith has a JD from Georgetown University and, like Abrams, was later employed by the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, where he taught a course on the Bush administration’s anti-terrorism policy.
My take is that the neocons weren’t behind the staged 9/11 attacks or the ”war on terror”. They played a major part temporarily, but in the grand scheme of things, they’re not that significant a group. While times change, the Jesuit Papacy stays, movements like neoconservatism come and go.
The Jesuits, CIA, and CFR deflecting the blame by pointing at Israel
This news snippet about a 2005 congress mock impeachment inquiry over the Iraq war is telling:
The session took an awkward turn when witness Ray McGovern, a former intelligence analyst, declared that the United States went to war in Iraq for oil, Israel and military bases craved by administration “neocons” so “the United States and Israel could dominate that part of the world.” He said that Israel should not be considered an ally and that Bush was doing the bidding of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
“Israel is not allowed to be brought up in polite conversation,” McGovern said. “The last time I did this, the previous director of Central Intelligence called me anti-Semitic.”
Rep. James P. Moran Jr. (D-Va.), who prompted the question by wondering whether the true war motive was Iraq’s threat to Israel, thanked McGovern for his “candid answer.”
Ex-CIA Ray McGovern said the same on MSNBC The Situation with Tucker Carlson in May 2006:
I‘ve been using the acronym O.I.L. for many—for two years now: O for oil; I for Israel; and L for logistics, logistics being the permanent—now we say “enduring”—military bases that the U.S. wants to keep in Iraq.
And, as it happens, McGovern is Jesuit trained. He has a MS from Fordham University, the Jesuit university in New York City. And so is James P. Moran Jr., who has a BA from the Jesuit College of the Holy Cross. Just a coincidence? McGovern also used to be a regular guest of Alex Jones, who’s been outed as a CIA asset and gatekeeper for the Vatican years ago.
Another Jesuit trained ex-CIA, who’s been pointing fingers at Israel, is Michael Scheuer. He attended Jesuit Canisius College in Buffalo and used to be an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies.
(The CIA itself has even been called “Catholics in Action”, because it’s been largely dominated by Roman Catholics, many of them devout mass-goers. The founder himself, William J. Donovan, was a devout Roman Catholic and was awarded the highest possible honor by the Pope, Knight of St. Sylvester. And at least these notable CIA directors have been Knights of Malta: John McCone (1961-1965), William Colby (1973-1976), and William J. Casey (1981-1987). In recent years, most CIA directors have been Jesuit trained, such as George Tenet (1997-2004), Leon Panetta (2009-2011), David Petraues (2011-2012), and John Brennan (2013-2017).)
Scheuer used to be a regular guest on CBS News and Fox News and has focused a lot on criticizing Israel and AIPAC, saying things like “we’re fighting wars for Israel” on TV. In his 2004 book Imperial Hubris, as an anonymous author, he said that one step in stopping the bogus “war on terror”, which was supposedly being fought against al-Qaeda and other jihadists, would be to “end all U.S. aid to Israel” and the “elimination of the Jewish state, and in its stead the creation of an Islamic Palestinian state”.
Scheuer also praised the New York Times Best Seller book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (2007), which sparked controversy and describes the lobby as a “loose coalition of individuals and organizations who actively work to steer U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction” and “focuses primarily on the lobby’s influence on U.S. foreign policy and its negative effect on American interests”.
John Mearsheimer, co-author of the book with Stephen Walt, happens to be a CFR member, as was another prominent endorser of the book, Jesuit trained Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski co-founded the globalist think tank Trilateral Commission with Japanese Jesuit coadjutor Tadashi Yamamoto, was a scholar for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and worked closely with PNAC associate Zalmay Khalilzad on Operation Cyclone to support the mujahideen jihadists, who resisted the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan. Brzezinski and his protege Khalilzad were instrumental in building up Islamic fundamentalism in Afghanistan, to be used as a tool of US geopolitics in the Middle East.
An in-depth look into Khalilzad’s dealings in the Middle East here.
Iraq War benefited Iran more than Israel?
Excellent scholarly researcher Francisco Gil-White, who got fired from the University of Pennsylvania for exposing the PLO, and basically being pro-Israel, while his superior, CFR member Ian Lustick was anti-Israel, writes:
Could a Shia-dominated Islamist Iraq under Iran’s influence be what the US ruling elite wants?
Consider something else that Newsweek says:
“Iranian interference continues to haunt future scenarios for an independent, stable Iraq. [US ambassador to Iraq Zalmay] Khalilzad, echoing other US officials, said he is hoping for a ‘significant withdrawal’ of US troops from Iraq next year. But the Bush administration worries that a fractured Iraq under weak leadership will be Tehran’s playground.”
It appears that Iraq is indeed expected to become “Tehran’s playground.” So the actual effect of the US invasion of Iraq will be to turn it into an Islamist puppet state of Iran.
But the text above bears scrutiny. If Khalilzad is “echoing other US officials” when he says he would like a major troop withdrawal by next year, then which “Bush administration” is it that “worries that a fractured Iraq…will be Tehran’s playground”? Isn’t the Bush administration composed of “US officials”? And isn’t Khalilzad, the US Ambassador to Iraq, supposed to be mouthing the US’s official policy towards Iraq? And if the growth of Iranian power is not what the US ruling elite wants, then why are Khalilzad and other US officials calling for withdrawing the troops, a policy that will abandon Iraq to Iran?
The US ruling elite will pull the troops out of Iraq in order to give Iraq to Iran, but will complain publicly about the outcome, giving the appearance of withdrawing the troops under pressure from the US public.
Consistent with this view, consider what the Toronto Star wrote on 24 November 2005, in an article titled “White House sets stage for pullback of troops”:
“Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, also told CNN this week he believed it would be possible to begin a withdrawal of American forces next year. The change in tone appears to be an acknowledgement of the increasing unpopularity of the war, with one national poll this week indicating 65 per cent of Americans would like to see the troops home by the end of 2006.”
The word “also” is appended to Khalilzad’s opinion because he was echoing Pentagon officials and US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, whose identical views were reported in the same article. But perhaps you will notice the contradiction in what the Daily News reported Khalilzad as saying only four days later:
“Bush’s ambassador to Iraq warned yesterday that pulling out of the country early would be disastrous. ‘Terrorists could take over part of this country and expand from here,’ Zalmay Khalilzad told Newsweek. ‘And given the resources of Iraq, given the technical expertise of its people, it will make Afghanistan look like child’s play.’”
Since a withdrawal needs to be planned, and since Zalmay Khalilzad’s preferred date for a major withdrawal — “next year” — is already upon us (this is November), Khalilzad is in fact calling for an immediate troop withdrawal even as he explains that “pulling out…early would be disastrous.” An absurdity? Not under my hypothesis: the US ruling elite wants the “disastrous” result, but knows that the American public will deplore it, so US officials must appear to deplore it also, and to be pulling out of Iraq reluctantly, under pressure from the American public. This is precisely why US government statements about impending withdrawal did not come before the polls began to show a strong US majority for it, as we see above.
Roman Catholic and Jesuit trained government officials and military officers leading the “war on terror”
Here’s a list of some of the Roman Catholic and/or Jesuit trained key leaders of the “war on terror”:
Secretary of Defense:
– Donald Rumsfeld (2001-2006). Attended Georgetown University. Friend and associate of Knight of Malta Frank Carlucci, Secretary of Defense under Reagan.
– Robert Gates (2006-2011). PhD and and honorary degree from Georgetown University.
– Leon Panetta (2011-2013). BA and JD from Jesuit Santa Clara University.
Deputy National Security Advisor for Iraq and Afghanistan:
– Meghan L. O’Sullivan (2004-2007). Roman Catholic. Graduated from Georgetown University. Member of the board of directors of the CFR and North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission.
– Douglas Lute (2007-2010). Roman Catholic. His wife Jane Holl Lute, Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security (2009-2013), has a JD from Georgetown University.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
– Peter Pace (2005-2007). A devout Roman Catholic. Georgetown Leadership Seminar alumnus. Awarded President’s Medal by Georgetown University and John Carroll Medal by the John Carroll Society.
– Michael Mullen (2007-2011). Roman Catholic.
– Martin Dempsey (2011-2015). Roman Catholic.
Commander of the United States Central Command:
– John Abizaid (2003-2007). Roman Catholic.
– William J. Fallon (2007-2008). Roman Catholic. Graduated from a Catholic university.
– Martin Dempsey (2008). See above.
– David Petraeus (2008-2010). Completed a military fellowship at the Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service.
– John R. Allen (2010). Graduated with a MA from Georgetown University.
– Jim Mattis (2010-2013). A devout Roman Catholic. Keynote speaker at the 2019 Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner.
Commander of Multi-National Force – Iraq:
– Ricardo Sanchez (2003-2004). Roman Catholic.
– George W. Casey Jr. (2004-2007). Graduated from Jesuit Boston College High School and from Georgetown University with a BS.
– David Petraeus (2007-2008). See above.
– Raymond T. Odierno (2008-2010). Roman Catholic.
Commander of Multi-National Corps — Iraq:
– Peter W. Chiarelli. Roman Catholic. Graduated from Jesuit Seattle University with a BS and from Catholic Salve Regina University with a MA.
– Raymond T. Odierno. See above.
Vatican still wants Jerusalem
Could the underlying reason for the US wars in the Middle East be related to the Vatican’s quest for Jerusalem? It would make a lot of sense, remembering how “crypto-Catholic” George W. Bush talked about these wars being a “crusade”, and noting how they were led mostly by Roman Catholics and Jesuit agents.
Here’s some history of the Vatican’s policy on the status of Jerusalem:
Already during the 19th century, the Holy See was concerned about the control over the holy places in Palestine, especially in Jerusalem. In 1887, Pope Leo XIII issued a motu proprio titled Domini et Salvatoris, in which he called for the establishment of a Catholic fund to maintain the holy places in Jerusalem and the Holy Land.
The early Zionists sought to assure the Vatican of the sanctity of Christian holy places, but the Vatican was not satisfied with these assurances. The Vatican was not invited to attend the 1920 San Remo conference, which decided the fate of Palestine, and had to rely on France and Italy to represent its interests. The San Remo conference set aside a Protectorate of the Holy See. According to Minerbi, the Vatican’s objectives were ultimately undermined by the Zionist Organization’s support for a British Mandate.
But the Vatican did not give up on its objective of direct Catholic control of the Holy Land and the holy places. The Vatican’s idea for an international commission to resolve claims on the holy places had been incorporated in article 95 of the Treaty of Sèvres, and was repeated as articles 13 and 14 of the Mandate. Britain assumed responsibility for the holy places under article 13 of the Mandate. However, Britain never created the International Commission on Holy Places to resolve the other claims in accordance with article 14 of the Mandate.
Why does the Vatican want Jerusalem?
It can’t be that the Vatican is only interested in “access to their Holy Sites” in Jerusalem. They already have that as well as legal jurisdiction under Israeli law for their institutions and assets in Jerusalem. Also, when these “Holy Sites” were under the jurisdiction of the Jordanians from l948-l967, no Pope demanded the “internationalization of Jerusalem”.
It is something else, which the Vatican wants. The Roman Catholic Church, need to have certain versions of events be played out for them to stand in front of mankind and proclaim: “our Messiah has returned.” Of course, to the Jews, this Messiah will be as false as the first one was supposed to be. Don’t matter. This is the goal of the Vatican and this is what all Israelis need to worry about.
First, you have to realize that for centuries The Vatican has attempted to obtain control of Jerusalem, which started with the Crusades. For them to convince the world that the Messiah they put on the world’s stage is going to be accepted as genuine, they need to perform this play in the Old City. The story of this production is that this “Messiah” will merge the three monotheistic religions, usher in peace and harmony in the world, and solve the Middle East conflict. The location for this “production” will be in none other than the Old City of Jerusalem.
This so-called “Messiah” that will be proclaimed, will be a false one and it will insist that by having a “world government” (i.e., the United Nations) the world peace and harmony will be ushered in. This will be a lie, and a fraud, but never mind. In our world, reality isn’t important. Public perceptions are. The end result is the stripping of Israel’s sovereignty as an independent nation giving way to a “regional bloc of nations” in the Middle East.
Vatican agent Shimon Peres
Labor Zionist leader and longtime influencer in Israeli politics, Shimon Peres (1923-2016), actually secretly promised to hand over Jerusalem to the Vatican amidst the Oslo Accords negotiations. He met with the Popes and visited the Vatican often, and it’s quite apparent that he was a Vatican agent. On his now defunct website, investigative journalist Barry Chamish (1952-2016) looked back to how he broke the story:
In 1979, Yitzhak Rabin published his autobiography, within was a one-line offbeat quote. He said that unlike all Jewish children growing up in Poland, Shimon Peres spent his early education at a Jesuit school. It was an odd fact and I took a mental note of it without understanding its significance…
Until I broke my first attention-getting story as a political journalist:
In March 1994, the newspaper Chadashot revealed a most remarkable secret of the Middle East “peace” process. A friend of Shimon Peres, the French intellectual Marek Halter… claimed in an interview that in May 1993, he delivered a letter from Peres to the pope. Within, Peres promised to internationalize Jerusalem, granting the UN political control of the Old City of Jerusalem, and the Vatican hegemony of the holy sites within. The UN would give the PLO a capital within its new territory and East Jerusalem would become a kind of free trade zone of world diplomacy.
Halter’s claim was backed by the Italian newspaper La Stampa which added that Arafat was apprised of the agreement and it was included in the secret clauses of the Declaration Of Principles signed in Washington in September 1993.
In March 1995, the Israeli radio station Arutz Sheva was leaked a cable from the Israeli Embassy in Rome to Peres’s Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem confirming the handover of Jerusalem to the Vatican. This cable was printed on the front page of the radical leftwing Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz two days later. A scandal erupted and numerous rabbis who had invited Peres for Passover services cancelled their invitations in protest of his treachery. Peres reacted by claiming that the cable was real but that someone had whited out the word, “not;” the cable really said that Israel would “not” hand Jerusalem over to the holy pontiff.
Illustrating the sorry political state of Israel’s rabbis, they accepted this cockamamie excuse and re-invited Peres to their tables. However, in the widely distributed minutes of a meeting with Clinton in 1997, Peres reiterated his diplomacy, ending with the words, “as I had previously promised the Holy See.”
Along the way, Peres also publicly expressed his willingness to give the Vatican what he promised;
President Shimon Peres is willing to hand over Israeli sovereignty of key Christian holy sites to the Vatican, a proposition that is reportedly opposed by Interior Minister Eli Yishai and that has ruffled feathers among other senior government officials, Army Radio reported on Monday. Beit Hanassi could not be reached for comment on Monday, as it does not issue statements to the press while the president is abroad. According to the radio report, the president is exerting pressure on the government to give up sovereignty over six sites, including the Church of the Annunciation in Nazareth, the Coenaculum on Mount Zion, Gethsemane on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, and the Church of the Multiplication on the Kinneret.
— Jerusalem Post, May 4, 2009
Pope Benedict XVI and Shimon Peres
Shimon Peres and Pope Francis in Israel
Around the same time the Vatican’s representatives made many aggressive statements directed at Israel:
Pope Benedict’s point man for justice and peace issues on Wednesday issued the Vatican’s toughest criticism of Israel since the latest Mideast crisis began, calling Gaza a “big concentration camp.”
Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Vatican’s Council for Justice and Peace, made his comments in an interview in the Italian online newspaper Il Sussidiario.net.
— Reuters, January 7, 2009
Israel cannot use the Biblical concept of a promised land or a chosen people to justify new “settlements” in Jerusalem or territorial claims, a Vatican synod on the Middle East said on Saturday.
Asked about the passage at a news conference, Greek-Melchite Archbishop Cyrille Salim Bustros, said:
“We Christians cannot speak about the promised land for the Jewish people. There is no longer a chosen people. All men and women of all countries have become the chosen people.
“The concept of the promised land cannot be used as a base for the justification of the return of Jews to Israel and the displacement of Palestinians,” he added. “The justification of Israel’s occupation of the land of Palestine cannot be based on sacred scriptures.”
The synod’s concluding message repeated a Vatican call for Jerusalem to have a special status “which respects its particular character” as a city sacred to the three great monotheistic religions — Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
— ynetnews, October 23, 2010
“Peace negotiations in the Middle East must tackle the issue of the status of the holy sites of Jerusalem”, Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, head of the Vatican’s Council for Interreligious Dialogue, declared several days ago in Rome.
The Vatican’s former foreign minister asked to place some Israeli holy places under Vatican authority, alluding to the Cenacle on Mount Zion and the garden of Gethsemane at the foot of the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.
The first site also houses what is referred to as King David’s tomb.
“There will not be peace if the question of the holy sites is not adequately resolved”, Tauran said. “The part of Jerusalem within the walls – with the holy sites of the three religions – is humanity’s heritage. The sacred and unique character of the area must be safeguarded and it can only be done with a special, internationally-guaranteed statute”.
The Israeli government and the Vatican are deadlocked in discussions over the status of the religious sites. Vatican officials are now reiterating their demand for control over the religious sites in the ancient and holy city founded by King David as the capital of ancient Israel and now the capital of the reestablished Jewish state.
Danny Ayalon, Israel’s deputy foreign minister, declared that Israel might consider giving the Vatican “a greater role” in operating the sites. In the last weeks, the Roman Catholic Church’s authorities increased their political initiatives for Catholic control over some sites in Jerusalem.
The Vatican’s former arcibishop in Jerusalem, Michel Sabbah, just promoted an appeal to the European Union and United States to “stop the Hebraization of Jerusalem”.
— Giulio Meotti, December 15, 2011
Since Jorge Maria Bergoglio became the new Pope, and the first Jesuit pope, in 2013, things have cooled a bit, though, at least seemingly. In June 2014, there was an ecumenical meeting in the Vatican, where Pope Francis, Israeli president Shimon Peres, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, and Greek Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew prayed together “for peace in the Middle East”. A Jewish rabbi and a Muslim imam were also present.
And Peres called for the establishment of “United Religions”:
“In the past, the majority of wars were motivated by the idea of nationhood. Today, instead, wars are sparked above all with the excuse of religion,” Peres said.
“Now, given the fact that the United Nations has had its day, what is needed is an Organisation of United Religions, a U.N. of religions. It would be the best way to combat these terrorists who kill in the name of faith because the majority of people are not like them …,” he said.
So, think of this: Why are there all of these powerful Catholic chivalric orders? Such as the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta aka Knights of Malta, the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem aka Knights of the Holy Sepulchre, the Order of Brothers of the German House of Saint Mary in Jerusalem aka Teutonic order, and the Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George. The clue is in their names; many of them they include “Jerusalem”.
Situation Room is a photograph taken by White House photographer Pete Souza in its namesake, the White House Situation Room, at 4:05 pm on May 1, 2011. The photograph shows President of the United States Barack Obama along with his national security team, receiving live updates from Operation Neptune Spear, which led to the killing of Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaeda.
Here’s a fact about the photo that hardly anyone noticed, let alone understood the significance of:
As a Catholic counter, Graziano misses almost nothing. In the famous war room photograph of White House officials watching Navy SEALs take out Osama bin Laden on May 1, 2011, he notes (citing Dario Fabbri’s article “The Roman Factor,” published in Limes), “nine are Catholic or received a Jesuit education.” In Obama’s second term, the second, third, fourth, and fifth positions in the line of succession were held by Catholics: Vice President Joe Biden, Speaker of the House John Boehner, President pro tempore of the Senate Patrick Leahy, and Secretary of State John Kerry. In addition, Catholics comprised “more than one-third of the members of the government, all of the most important military positions, two-thirds of the Supreme Court and 38 percent of US governors.”
On May 1, 2011, the official photographer Pete Souza takes the snapshot symbol of the killing of bin Laden. In a room adjacent to the Situation Room, the top national security officers are apprehensive about the last minutes of the sheikh of terror’s life. Out of thirteen people identified in photo 2 – including Obama and Clinton – nine are Catholic or have received Jesuit education. These are Joe Biden, Denis McDonough, Robert Gates, Mike Mullen, Tom Donilon, William Daley, Audrey Tomason, John Brennan and James Clapper. The distance between the two historical moments appears exorbitant. In just over fifty years the percentage of Catholics out of the total population has remained almost unchanged (around 25%), but their political and cultural influence has largely gone beyond the limits of demography. To the point that Kennedy’s speech, although necessary, now sounds anachronistic. Never have so many Catholics held the highest government, military and judicial offices in the United States simultaneously.
— Dario Fabbri
Why indeed don’t Americans notice thing like this?
In the words of Georgetown University’s Jacques Berlinerblau, the Bible as a political document “is to clear and coherent political deliberation as sleet, fog, hail and flash floods are to highway safety.” “American Protestants,” agrees historian Gaetano Salvemini, “have their heart in the right place and their head nowhere: they do not even realize the importance of the fact that half of their diplomatic staff (Catholic or not) has passed through schools run by Jesuits.” As late as 1950, Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service — President Bill Clinton’s alma mater — was the only American university offering a course for diplomats.
Here’s the photo with annotations:
Here are the nine Roman Catholic and/or Jesuit trained Obama’s advisors in the photo, out of the 12 that have been identified:
1. Joe Biden, Vice President of the United States. Biden is a Roman Catholic and has received honorary degrees from two Jesuit universities, the University of Scranton (1976) and Saint Joseph’s University (1981). His son Hunter was Jesuit trained at Georgetown University, the Jesuit headquarters and power base in America located in Washington, D.C. After graduating from Georgetown with a BA, he served in the Jesuit Volunteer Corps, and in 2008 he lobbied for five Jesuit universities, including University of Scranton, which is located in his father’s hometown. Hunter Biden is thus a clear case of a “Jesuit of the short robe”, i.e., not officially a member of the Jesuit order, but a coadjutor and totally in league with them.
2. Denis McDonough, Deputy National Security Advisor. McDonough was raised in a devout Irish Catholic family. He graduated with a BA from Saint John’s University, a Benedictine Catholic university, and with a MS from Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, which was mentioned in the book review above. In a 2012 White House ceremony for Cath school leaders, he said that the influence of the Sisters of St. Joseph at St. Croix Catholic elementary and Benedictine monks of Saint John’s University enable him to “make well-rounded and just recommendations to the president”. His brother Kevin is a Catholic priest and was the Vicar General of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis for 17 years.
3. Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense. Gates has a PhD from Georgetown University and also received an honorary degree from there in 2014.
4. Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Mullen is a Roman Catholic and attended Catholic schools.
5. Tom Donilon, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. Donilon is a Roman Catholic, attended a Catholic high school, and graduated with a BA from the Catholic University of America. His wife Cathy Russell, a longtime advisor to Joe Biden and his wife Jill Biden, has a BA from Jesuit Boston College, and brother Mike Donilon, also a longtime advisor to Biden, has a BA and JD from Georgetown University.
7. Audrey Tomason, Director for Counterterrorism for the National Security Council. Tomason is a Roman Catholic, at least according to Dario Fabbri.
8. John O. Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. Brennan graduated from a Catholic high school and has a BA from Fordham University, the Jesuit university in New York City.
9. James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence. Clapper has a MA from St. Mary’s University, a Marianist Catholic university in Texas, and held the position of Georgetown University’s Intelligence and National Security Alliance Distinguished Professor in the Practice of Intelligence for the 2006–2007 academic year.
In addition to that, these two have clear ties to the Jesuits through their spouses:
Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State. Her equally (in)famous husband Bill Clinton has a BS from Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, and he’s publicly said that Carroll Quigley, his professor there, was a great influence to him.
Tony Blinken, National Security Advisor to the Vice President. Blinken is the only Jewish advisor on the photo, and his wife Evan Ryan, who served as an Assistant Secretary of State and an advisor to Vice President Joe Biden, was Jesuit trained at Boston College.
The last identified advisor was Brigadier General Marshall B. Webb, Assistant Commanding General of the Joint Special Operations Command. He’s the only one who isn’t a Roman Catholic, Jesuit trained, or tied to the Jesuits.
Obama’s own Jesuit connections
Now, most people know that Barack Obama worked extensively in community organizing. But was not so well-known, however, is that this community organizing was done when Obama was hired by a lay Catholic minister, Jerry Kellman, as lead organizer for a Chicago organization called the “Developing Communities Project”, which was funded by Chicago’s south-side Catholic churches. What is also most interesting is that “Obama’s Chicago mentor” Gregory Galluzzo was a Jesuit priest; Obama’s Chief Speechwriter, Jon Favreau, is a Jesuit-trained “ethics” professor; Obama’s Senior Military and Foreign Policy Advisor, Maj. Gen. J. Scott Gration, was Jesuit-trained; and Obama’s Deputy Communications Director, Dan Pfeiffer, was Jesuit-trained. And he has chosen a Jesuit-controlled Joe Biden as his vice-president! Do you think that all of Mr. Obama’s Jesuit connections are mere coincidences? And have you wondered why the other side ran “a corpse” and a “hockey mum” against him? To ensure his victory!
— P. D. Stuart, Codeword Barbelon – Danger in the Vatican: The Sons of Loyola and Their Plans for World Domination… Book 1, p. 183
Jerry Kellman was born Jewish and became a disciple of Saul Alinsky in the early 1970s. In 1983 Kellman converted to Catholicism, and he has a Master of Divinity from Jesuit Loyola University Chicago.
The “corpse” Stuart is referring to, is of course John McCain. McCain and his wife Cindy were friends with Jesuit priest Edward Reese. Two of McCain’s sons attended Brophy College Preparatory, a Jesuit high school in Phoenix, where Reese was then the president.
And about Obama’s other Chicago mentor, Gregory Galluzzo, a former Jesuit priest and head of the Gamaliel Foundation:
“Alinsky said, ‘We have to create an organization that allows people to have a voice in the political decisions that affect their lives,’” said Galluzzo, a former Jesuit priest. “If Moses acted like most clergy he would have gone down to the slave camps of Egypt and opened a food pantry. If Moses would have done that we never would have heard of Moses. He understood that the problem was that they were working under oppression.”
Stanley Kurtz in the conservative National Review:
So, yes, as the New York Times claims, Obama was effectively proselytizing for the Catholic church. But this was part of a larger, far more questionable and controversial deal. Effectively it was an attempt by Galluzzo, Kellman, and Obama to commandeer local Catholic congregations from within, turning them into political shock troops in their hardball Alinskyite organizing ventures.
In my book Radical-in-Chief, I lay out Galluzzo’s Catholic strategy and show the sort of events he encouraged his new congregational recruits to participate in: trapping a U.S. senator in a ladies room, pushing for a school to be named after anti-American heroes, singling out and intimidating opponents by calling them “enemies of the community,” and besieging them at their homes. Obama worked directly with UNO of Chicago during his organizing days, and funded his Alinskyite friends to run these tactics for years thereafter from his position on the boards of several left-leaning Chicago foundations.
I don’t know if Kurtz just doesn’t realize it or if he knows more about the Jesuits than he lets on, but when you think about it, that actually makes perfect sense. Because the Jesuits are inherently anti-American; they came to America to infiltrate and subvert the originally white protestant nation and turn it from a free constitutional republic to a totalitarian empire. And all things considered, they have obviously succeeded in it quite well.
Galluzzo is not a “rogue Jesuit”, he’s probably just been practicing classic Jesuit casuistry, where the “end justifies the means”, as per Jesuit writers throughout history. Or if he was, why would Obama still have been their man and surrounded himself with dozens of Jesuit coadjutors during his presidency? Obviously the Jesuits liked what Galluzzo and Kellman had been doing and what kind of a politician they had created in Obama.
Jesuits and “social justice”
For the Jesuits, promoting “social justice”, like what Obama’s mentors Chicago mentors Galluzzo and Kellman have been involved with, is just a means to an end; it’s a way to weaken and demoralize the already subverted nation even further, to divide and conquer, to create order out of chaos.
Well, what has the “social justice” movement in America done anyway, other than polarized the nation, pitted women and against men, whites against blacks etc.? And disenfranchised and demoralized the strongest element and maintaining force of the nation, aka white men, traditionally especially white protestant men? Because the whole notion of social injustice implies there’s an oppressor, and in the American “social justice” narrative it’s been the white man, while women and racial minorities, especially black people, have been seen as the oppressed class.
Jesuit priest Richard McSorley (1914-2002), who marched with Martin Luther King Jr. among other things, was a prominent early social justice advocate, and he founded and headed the Georgetown University Center for Peace Studies. He was also a supporter and friend of Georgetown graduate Bill Clinton. McSorley was influenced by another Jesuit priest, John Large Jr., who also marched with King before his death in 1963. LaFarge started pushing the “anti-racist” narrative already in the 1930s, around the same time as European communists popularized the word “racism” as a tool demonize nationalism, and founded the Catholic Interracial Council of New York, which later became a part of the National Catholic Conference on Interracial Justice.
Osama bin Laden a CIA asset and already dead in 2001?
Without going deeper into the subject in this article, it should be noted that 9/11 was an inside job, a false flag, and a staged event. That is, Osama bin Laden had nothing to with it, unless he was a willing patsy. That might also have been the case, because he was allegedly a CIA asset under the name “Tim Osman”.
Economics Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa has just completed a detailed history of bin Laden’s career detailing his secret funding and logistical support to terrorist organizations beginning from his early CIA-supported roots in the 1980s as a “freedom fighter” through to the present day.
Tim Osman (Ossman) has become better known as Osama Bin Laden. “Tim Osman” was the name assigned to him by the CIA for his tour of the U.S. and U.S. military bases, in search of political support and armaments. […] There is some evidence that Tim Osman … visited the White House. There is certainty that Tim Osman toured some U.S. military bases, even receiving special demonstrations of the latest equipment. Why hasn’t this been reported in the major media?
About bin Laden’s death from the same article:
In his book “Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?“, the political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California’s Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves – for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West.
The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan’s Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom.
Both Fox News and New York Times also reported bin Laden’s death back then. So did he die then or in May 2011 in Operation Neptune Fear, which the photo Situation Room is related to? Look at the evidence gathered and presented by Michael Rivero and decide for yourself. And more discussion about bin Laden and his death here.
Either way, the Jesuits were obviously controlling the narrative through their agents.
Trilateral Commission, the UN, and globalism
The Trilateral Commission, though less known than the notorious Bilderberg Group, is one of the most prominent and important globalist think tanks. These secretive elite think tanks are working to bring about a “new world order”, which entails undermining the sovereignty of nation states and implementing global government. Global government has of course, to a large extent, already been achieved through the United Nations, especially with the global warming/climate change scam, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) being its massive climate propaganda machine.
Another key tool for furthering the globalist agenda is the mass immigration of people from the third world to Europe and the West, which is an effective way to weaken nation states, because they are, in the end, held together by the sense of national unity. That’s why Peter Sutherland (1946-2018), a leading member of both the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, and UN Special Representative for International Migration, once said that the EU should undermine national homogeneity of its member states. The UN has also had a plan for “replacement migration”, which basically means mass scale population transfers aka government enabled and sanctioned mass immigration to European and Western countries (and Japan), the pretext being the aging of the population in them. And still leftists say the Great Replacement is a “far right, white supremacist conspiracy theory”. Sutherland also served as a financial adviser to the Vatican, and he was Jesuit trained.
Jesuits and the founding of the Trilateral Commission
But who founded the Trilateral Commission in 1973? It was none other than David Rockefeller (1915-2017), whose right-hand man in organizing the group was Zbigniew Brzezinski (1928-2017). Brzezinski was Jesuit trained at Loyola High School in Montreal and later received an honorary degree from Fordham University, the Jesuit university in New York City, of which alumni include Donald Trump and Andrew Cuomo, the current Governor of New York.
As the Trilateral Commission was formed to serve as a liaison between the elites of Japan, North American nations, and Western European nations, there was also a Japanese founding member. The man was Tadashi Yamamoto (1936-2012). Yamamoto enrolled at Sophia University, the Jesuit university in Tokyo, in 1954 with the intention of becoming a Catholic priest. But his career plans changed and he transferred to St. Norbert College, a Catholic college in Wisconsin, in 1958. He studied in the USA from 1958 until 1962, receiving his MBA from Marquette University, a Jesuit university in Milwaukee. I guess we can say Yamamoto was a “Jesuit of the short robe”, like the leading coronavirus expert Anthony Fauci.
Brzezinski, CFR, and the Israel lobby
As an interesting side note, you may remember the controversy over the book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (2007), which describes the lobby as a “loose coalition of individuals and organizations who actively work to steer U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction” and “focuses primarily on the lobby’s influence on U.S. foreign policy and its negative effect on American interests”. John Mearsheimer, co-author of the book with Stephen Walt, happens to be a member of the New York based American globalist think tank Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). And so was of course also David Rockefeller, who served as its chairman (1970-1985), and his associate and middleman Brzezinski.
Brzezinski praised the book of his fellow CFR member Mearsheimer, having always also been a prominent critic of Israel’s policies. Not that the influence of the Israel lobby isn’t an issue that should be addressed, but can you see how all this works? A Jesuit trained CFR member and globalist endorsing a book about the Israeli influence by another CFR member, while we should put the CFR itself under great scrutiny, and of course also talk about the vast Jesuit Vatican influence in America. Thus, what we have here with the book and the controversy surrounding it, is a good example of a “limited hangout” on a sociopolitical level.
The book was publicly endorsed also by ex-CIA Michael Scheuer, who used to be a regular guest on CBS News and Fox News and has focused a lot on criticizing Israel and AIPAC, sometimes saying things like “we’re fighting wars for Israel” on TV. In his 2004 book Imperial Hubris, as an anonymous author, he said that one step in stopping the bogus “war on terror”, which was supposedly being fought against al-Qaeda and other jihadists, would be to “end all U.S. aid to Israel” and the “elimination of the Jewish state, and in its stead the creation of an Islamic Palestinian state”.
As it happens, Scheuer was Jesuit trained at Canisius College in Buffalo, and he used to be an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Peace and Security Studies. Georgetown University is of course the Jesuit university in Washington, D.C., and the Jesuit headquarters and power base in America.
On one of their regular radio shows, Eric Jon Phelps and his co-host George Widger brought up the control that the Jesuits seem to have over the Philadelphia government, especially its police department. I think this is a good case to use as an enlightening example of how much influence the Jesuits really do have in the USA. Those who say they don’t, either haven’t looked into it properly or are knowingly trying to draw attention away from the Jesuits.
Before looking at the evidence, let’s establish what being Jesuit trained and/or a Jesuit coadjutor basically means (as per Eric Jon Phelps);
Q: I would like to know from you what it means for someone to be Jesuit-trained. Does the Jesuit Order keep (close) contact with its pupil for the entire duration of the pupil’s life? Do the Jesuits openly manipulate their pupils after their education, steering them into certain directions beneficial to the Order on the excuse of merely ‘advising’ them? Or do they perhaps do that more stealthily and cunningly, by subtly providing their pupils with information at which the pupil then decides ostensibly by his or hers own volition the course in life ideally never suspecting that the Order is subtly steering them into their preferred direction? How does it pay off to have a Jesuit education? Are Temporal Coadjutors Jesuit-trained by definition?
A: The Order’s Temporal Coadjutors may or may not be Jesuit trained. Those students who are trained by the Jesuits have the greatest possibility of finding a job after graduation. Their education is first, their placement is second and the reason for which the Order trained them. Their grads are found in every profession and walk of life. It is in these vocations that they become the most dangerous, men like Tim Russert and Chris Matthews of the Order’s CFR-controlled Press. Many coajdutors are Yale and Harvard Grads. The Order has a Jesuit House at Harvard, the alma mater of Coadjutor Bill O’Reilly. If the Order puts you in political office, it expects you to submit to their advisor, men like Jesuit priest John McLaughlin, the man who wrote Nixon’s speeches. If you jettison the Order that put you in office, then you will be punished or killed.
So, what does the Philadelphia Police Department leadership look like?
The Commissioner since December 2019 is Danielle Outlaw (funny name for a police chief, don’t you think…), who had previously served as chief of the Portland Police Bureau (2013-2017). Outlaw attended a Catholic sisterhood sponsored high school in Oakland, California and then graduated with a BA from the University of San Francisco, a Jesuit university.
The Deputy Commissioner of Organizational Services, and the second highest ranking officer in the Philadelphia police, is Christine Coulter, who served as interim Commissioner from 2018 to 2019. Coulter holds a MS in public safety management from Saint Joseph’s University, the Jesuit university in Philadelphia, and is also a faculty member in the graduate Public Safety program at Saint Joseph’s University’s Institute of Criminal Justice and Public Safety Administration.
The Deputy Commissioner of Special Operations, Dennis Wilson, holds a MS in criminal justice from the aforementioned Saint Joseph’s University.
Thus, three of the four highest ranking officers of the Philadelphia police are Jesuit trained. What’s more, Outlaw’s and Coulter’s predecessor Richard Ross Jr., like Wilson, has a MS in criminal justice from the Saint Joseph’s University.
Why are the Jesuits so keen on educating people?
Have you ever wondered why the Society of Jesus, supposedly merely a religious order of priests and monks, are so keen on educating people? Why is it so important for them to groom people to serve in all kinds of governmental and public offices, or have their own made men, such as the leading coronavirus (plandemic) expert Anthony Fauci, who are “dedicated to public service”? Obviously it’s for the reasons outlined by Eric Jon Phelps above, and it’s a great way to gain influence in the country with hardly anyone even noticing it.
The Society of Jesus is a military religious order, and the 27 Jesuit universities and colleges in the USA are not mere places of education, but also “military bases” used in the infiltration and subversion of America, once an overwhelmingly white protestant country.
With that said, the Mayor of Philadelphia, Jim Kenney, is also Jesuit trained. He graduated from St. Joseph’s Preparatory School, the Jesuit high school in Philadelphia, and has a BA from La Salle University, a small Lasallian Catholic university in Philadelphia.
The Casey family and the Jesuits
As Philadelphia is the largest city of Pennsylvania, it’s worth mentioning that the Democrat Senator from Pennsylvania, Bob Casey Jr., is Jesuit trained as well. Casey graduated from the Jesuit Scranton Preparatory School, a Jesuit high school in Pennsylvania, and from the College of the Holy Cross, a Jesuit college in Worcester, Massachusetts. His JD he received from the Catholic University of America. Between college and law school, Casey served as a member of the Jesuit Volunteer Corps.
Casey can thus well be called a “Jesuit of the short robe”, i.e., a man who’s not officially a member of the Jesuit order, but its close associate and good friend. His father Bob Casey Sr. was the 42nd Governor of Pennsylvania, and he graduated from the Scranton Preparatory School and the College of the Holy Cross like his senator son. And his father again was a devout Roman Catholic and attended Fordham University, the Jesuit university in New York City.
Basically, even if the coronavirus is only assumed to have caused or contributed to the death, it will be reported as a “COVID-19 death”, and hence added to the overall statistics;
NCHS is receiving questions about how deaths involving the new coronavirus strain should be reported on death certificates. We are working on formal guidance to certifiers to be published as soon as possible. In the meantime, to address the immediate need, here is some basic information that can be shared in advance of the more formal and detailed guidance. It is important to emphasize that Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Other terminology, e.g., SARS-CoV-2, can be used as long as it is clear that it indicates the 2019 coronavirus strain, but we would prefer use of WHO’s standard terminology, e.g., COVID-19. Specification of the causal pathway leading to death in Part I of the certificate is also important. For example, in cases when COVID-19 causes pneumonia and fatal respiratory distress, both pneumonia and respiratory distress should be included along with COVID-19 in Part I. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc. If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.
And, from the April 3 CDC memo:
An accurate count of the number of deaths due to COVID–19 infection, which depends in part on proper death certification, is critical to ongoing public health surveillance and response. When a death is due to COVID–19, it is likely the UCOD and thus, it should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I of the death certificate. Ideally, testing for COVID–19 should be conducted, but it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate without this confirmation if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.
It’s easy to see how all this will inflate the total number of COVID-19 deaths, much like in Italy, where only 12% of the cases that get reported as coronavirus deaths have had the virus as a direct causal factor in the death certificate. I.e., the authorities are artificially boosting the numbers to make things look much worse than they actually are, as many skeptics have suspected all along, and by doing so, perpetuating the illusion of a pandemic. This has raised concern, not only in the social media and among “conspiracy theorists” or bloggers like me, but some politicians have also spoken out about this:
Republican state Sen. Jim Abeler, a prominent lawmaker on health matters in the Legislature, tweeted out his concern Monday. Abeler isn’t pushing the theories about political or financial motives. But he said there should be precision when assigning a cause of death.
“I don’t think the death certificate is a ‘maybe’ document. There shouldn’t be assumptions on there,” Abeler said in a phone interview Tuesday. “It should be the best available information. It should be with the highest degree of certainty. The minute we put assumptions and maybes on the death certificate, we now have a certificate that is meaningless and it’s an opinion document.”
Abeler and others who share his view also say there needs to be a clear distinction between dying from coronavirus and dying with it.
The director of the CDC is Jesuit trained, like coronavirus expert Anthony Fauci
An interesting fact, especially to those who are knowledgeable of the key role the Jesuits play in the advancement of the New World Order agenda, is that the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Robert R. Redfield, is Jesuit educated, with a BS and MD from the Georgetown University, the Jesuit headquarters and power base in America. As is Anthony Fauci, the leading coronavirus expert in America, who attended a Jesuit high school in New York and graduated from the College of the Holy Cross, a Jesuit college in Worcester, Massachusetts.
One of his schools, Regis High School, is a Jesuit school in Manhattan, and Dr. Fauci praises the Jesuitical system of education as being highly intellectual, highly logical and intensely curious.
“The Jesuits have always trained one to have precision of thought and economy of expression. Today, I tell my fellows: ‘Be very precise in what you have to say and say it in a way that’s very clear.’ I think this training helped me in that regard, although I believe I naturally had this ability to be precise and economical. Nevertheless, I think this schooling gave me a real feel for life,” he says.
Are Jesuits controlling the coronavirus narrative? Well, surely not only them, but they do have men in key positions to steer it, as we can see above.
The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.
On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 per cent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three.
– Walter Ricciardi, scientific adviser to Italy’s minister of health
It means that the Italian death toll figures could have been artificially inflated by up to 88%. If true, this would mean the total number of Italians who have actually died of Covid19 could be as low as ~700. Which would bring Italy, currently a statistical outlier in terms of Covid19 fatalities, well in line with the rest of the world.
Or, as of now, April 2, 2020, a more accurate death toll in Italy would likely be 0.12×13915 ≈ 1670. We would then get a fatality rate of 1670/115242 ≈ 1.4%, which would be much closer to other European countries, like my home country, Finland, where the fatality rate is now 19/1518 ≈ 1.3%.
Of course, these are not the real fatality rates, either, which we get by dividing the number of deaths by the estimated number of coronavirus cases, not the number of confirmed cases, because the majority of possible coronavirus carriers don’t get tested at all. And if we do that, the fatality rate for both countries will be well below 1% and closer to the influenza fatality rate (0.1%).
News reports, like this from CBS, are saying that New York City hospitals that are “epicenters” of the coronavirus “crisis” are “overwhelmed”, and even like “war zones” in the “war against the coronavirus”. And tons of people are said to be lining up to get tested for COVID-19.
Yet, this Elmhurst Hospital, which is said to be the epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic in NYC, looks quiet when there are no TV cameras around.
No lines of people for coronavirus tests, and ambulances aren’t bringing in patients, either. Contrary to that, you mostly just see ambulances being parked and EMTs sitting around with no sense of urgency. So there’s a disconnect between the picture the media is painting and the reality that people can see, when they find out for themselves what’s going on.
It’s the same story all over America, and some other countries, too, like Germany and Ireland.
You may also have seen this sensationalist New York Times report form Elmhurst Hospital, featuring Dr. Colleen Smith:
Interestingly enough, Smith is, self-admittedly, a simulation expert. It’s interesting because she’s the face of the supposed coronavirus crisis in New York, and because the whole pandemic seems more like a simulation than a real crisis, like the Bill Gates sponsored Event 201, run on October 18, 2019, a few weeks before the supposed outbreak in Wuhan, China.
Search #emptyhospitals and #coronahoax on social media, for many more videos by independent citizen journalists. They show a very different picture than the MSM news reports that are overblowing the coronavirus “pandemic”.
More about the coronavirus sham on this blog: